nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whacky Weekend: Is Internet Access a Human Right?


From: Zaid Ali <zaid () zaidali com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:37:07 -0800


On 1/5/12 8:07 AM, "Jay Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zaid Ali" <zaid () zaidali com>

On 1/5/12 7:22 AM, "Jay Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote:

Vint Cerf says no: http://j.mp/wwL9Ip

But I wonder to what degree that's dependent on how much our
governments
make Internet access the most practical/only practical way to interact
with them.

Understand: I'm not saying that FiOS should be a human right. But as a
society, America's recognized for decades that you gotta have a
telephone,
and subsidized local/lifeline service to that extent; that sort of
subsidy
applies to cellular phones now as well.

I agree with Vint here. Basic human rights are access to food, clothing
and shelter. I think we are still struggling in the world with that.
With
your logic one would expect the radio and TV to be a basic human right
but
they are not, they are and will remain powerful medium which be enablers
of something else and the Internet would fit there.

Well, I dunno... as I think was obvious from my other comments: TV and
Radio
are *broadcast* media; telephones and the internet are not; they're
*two-way*
communications media... and they're the communications media which have
been
chosen by the organs of government we've constituted to run things for us.

You hit the important word, though, in your reply: "*access to* food,
clothing,
and shelter"... not the things themselves.

The question here is "is *access to* the Internet a human right,
something 
which the government ought to recognize and protect"?  I sort of think it
is,
myself... and I think that Vint is missing the point: *all* of the things
we generally view as human rights are enablers to other things, and we
generally dub them *as those things*, by synecdoche... at least in my
experience.


If I wrote a blog article that criticized the government and it was
shutdown along with my Internet access I wouldn't say that my right to the
Internet was violated. I would say that my right to free speech was
violated. Regardless of one way or two way communication it is
communication. 

Zaid 




Current thread: