nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux Centralized Administration
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:58:10 -0500
Sounds like a poorly designed package. Wordpress does a good job of allowing back end updates without impacting the services provided, even with database changes. Part of a well designed and maintained system is the ability to do painless upgrades. Jared Mauch On Jan 12, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
Cacti/OpenNMS are good examples -- after a yum update to a new version, you must manually invoke, a potentially dangerous "installer" program or web page has to be used, after a new update, config files, or database schema have to be edited or patched by hand; until you manually take some action to "fix" the config, the application is broken after update. As soon as you attempt to restart the application it will shutdown OK, but not come back up.
Current thread:
- RE: Linux Centralized Administration, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: Linux Centralized Administration Paul Stewart (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Matthew Palmer (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration John Adams (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Jimmy Hess (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration chaim.rieger () gmail com (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Paul Graydon (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Paul Graydon (Jan 12)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Daniel Ankers (Jan 13)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Jon Lewis (Jan 13)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration Nickola Kolev (Jan 13)
- Re: Linux Centralized Administration chaim.rieger () gmail com (Jan 12)
