nanog mailing list archives
Re: US DOJ victim letter
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:23:08 -0500
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:16:27 EST, Bryan Horstmann-Allen said:
Bit odd, if it's a phish. Even more odd if it's actually from the Fed.
What if it's a phish from a compromised Fed box? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: US DOJ victim letter, (continued)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Todd Lyons (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Ryan Gelobter (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter -Hammer- (Jan 20)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Mike Andrews (Jan 20)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Robert Bonomi (Jan 20)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Bryan Horstmann-Allen (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Randy Epstein (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Mike (Jan 27)
- Customer service (was Re: US DOJ victim letter) Sean Donelan (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Randy Epstein (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Martin Hannigan (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter bmanning (Jan 28)
- Message not available
- Re: US DOJ victim letter John Peach (Jan 28)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Ryan Gelobter (Jan 28)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Jon Lewis (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Matthew S. Crocker (Jan 30)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 31)