nanog mailing list archives
Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:07:30 -0800
You all have encouraged me to filter 'nanog.guru' in both sender _and_ recipient fields. If you insist on engaging the loons, please I beg you, cc them directly. Regards, -drc On Mar 6, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Guru NANOG <nanog.guru () gmail com> wrote:Adding four more bits to the Left of the Source Address and setting[snip] Any address extension scheme or change to IP addressing has to be meaningfully interoperable for it to be useful; the method must be standardized and become an accepted standard, otherwise it would be utterly useless. I would encourage you to read up on draft-ietf-lisp-22. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp/writeup/ Regards, -- -JH
Current thread:
- IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Guru NANOG (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Randy Whitney (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Justin M. Streiner (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Scott Morris (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Jimmy Hess (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support David Conrad (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Randy Bush (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support David Conrad (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Tim Jackson (Mar 06)
- Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Bjørn Mork (Mar 07)
