nanog mailing list archives

Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

From: Seth Mos <seth.mos () dds nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:23:25 +0100

On 12-3-2012 16:07, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:


Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us> writes:

Grass-roots, bottom-up policy process
+
Need for multihoming
+
Got tired of waiting
=
IPv6 PI


+
Cheap End Users
=
IPv6 NPt (IPv6 Prefix Translation)

Cheers,

Seth

Current thread:

Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mukom Akong T. (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
  - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
    - Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Doug Barton (Mar 11)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)
    - RE: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leigh Porter (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 18)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Tim Chown (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Łukasz Bromirski (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
    - Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Geoff Huston (Mar 12)

(Thread continues...)