nanog mailing list archives
Re: shared address space... a reality!
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:19:07 -0700
On Mar 16, 2012, at 3:59 PM, George Bonser wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com] In my perception, this is primarily a moving part that will be used by providers deploying IPv6 as a mechanism to compensate for things on the internet their customers want to reach that have not yet deployed IPv6.I think it will be used mostly as the middle 4 in NAT444 and in links between networks where there are RFC1918 network assignment collisions. My gut tells me we will see that net block being used for NAT on a lot of VPNs between RFC1918 networks.
I would agree with both of those statements.
I don't think any sane provider will use this as yet another way to avoid deploying IPv4.I hope you're right.
Certainly of the providers I have spoken with about the subject, that seems to be the prevailing attitude. So there is some hope. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: shared address space... a reality!, (continued)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Nate Davis (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! John Curran (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! cdel.firsthand.net (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)
