Home page logo
/

nanog logo nanog mailing list archives

RE: Prefix hijacking, how to prevent and fix currently
From: Doug Madory <dmadory () renesys com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 14:04:13 -0400

FWIW, this is from an IP squatting operation I came across in recent weeks. I encounter these things regularly in the 
course of working with BGP data - probably others do too. Usually I look up the ASN or prefix and often it has already 
been added to someone's spam source list. When I see that, I assume the "system is working" and move on.

In this case, starting late Jun, we have seen IP address ranges from around the world (most ranges are unused, 
sometimes hijacked space) announced by one of two (formerly unused) ASNs and routed through another formerly unused 
ASN, 57756, then on to Anders (AS39792) and out to the Internet in the following form:

        ... 39792 57756 {3.721, 43239}  prefix

The prefixes are only routed for an hour or two before it moves on to the next range of IP address space. Not sure if 
this is for spam or something else. Either way, it is probably associated with something bad. Earlier this month I 
reached out to a contact at Anders in Russia and gave him some details about what was happening. I didn't get a 
response, but within a couple of days the routing (mostly) shifted from Anders to through Petersburg Internet Network 
(AS44050). I have no idea if this was due to my email. The day it moved to PIN I sent similar emails to addresses I 
could find at PIN, but haven't seen any response. Now the these routes take one of two forms:

        ... 39792 57756 {3.721, 43239}  prefix

Or

        ... 44050 57756 {3.721, 43239}  prefix

This is mostly routed through Cogent (AS174), but Anders (AS39792) also has a lot of peers. I would advise that people 
treat any route coming through AS57756 is probably bad. AS57756 doesn't originate anything and hasn't since 28-Jun when 
it very briefly hijacked some NZ space.

Also, Pierre-Antoine Vervier from Symantec gave a good talk at NANOG in Feb about IP squatting for spam generation. 
Pierre and I have since compared notes on this topic.

-Doug Madory

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tarun Dua" <lists () tarundua net>
To: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:55:25 PM
Subject: Prefix hijacking, how to prevent and fix currently

AS Number 43239
AS Name SPETSENERGO-AS SpetsEnergo Ltd.

Has started hijacking our IPv4 prefix, while this prefix was NOT in
production, it worries us that it was this easy for someone to hijack
it.

http://bgp.he.net/AS43239#_prefixes

103.20.212.0/22 <- This belongs to us.

103.238.232.0/22 KNS Techno Integrators Pvt. Ltd.
193.43.33.0/24 hydrocontrol S.C.R.L.
193.56.146.0/24 TRAPIL - Societe des Transports Petroliers par Pipeline

Where do we complain to get this fixed.

-Tarun
AS132420


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]