nanog mailing list archives
Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs
From: Lee <ler762 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:37:03 -0400
On 4/20/16, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Others have already answered with the technical details. Let me take a stab at some more, uh, variable items.
[.. snip lots ..]
90%+ of the stacks deployed will be too small. Modern Unix generally has "autotuning" TCP stacks, but I don't think Windows or OS X has those features yet (but I'd be very happy to be wrong on that point).
Windows has had an autotuning stack since at least Vista. Regards, Lee
Current thread:
- Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 19)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Jared Mauch (Apr 19)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Eric Kuhnke (Apr 19)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs joel jaeggli (Apr 19)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Eric Kuhnke (Apr 19)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Leo Bicknell (Apr 20)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 20)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Lee (Apr 20)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Tony Finch (Apr 20)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Eygene Ryabinkin (Apr 21)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Chris Welti (Apr 24)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Lee (Apr 20)
- Re: Latency, TCP ACKs and upload needs Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 20)
