nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & Google IPv6
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:40:51 GMT
From nanog-bounces () nanog org Wed Feb 24 21:03:17 2016 In one's situation, does Cogent have enough pros to overcome the cons? Same for HE or any other carrier.
Who cares, with everyone trying to be IPv6 transit free and covering it with a settlement free peering policy it may accidentally turn into an open peering stand off and everyone wins (except single homed Cogent customers but they'll figure it out) brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Paras Jha (Feb 24)
- RE: Cogent & Google IPv6 Damien Burke (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Mike Hammett (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Ricky Beam (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- Re: Cogent & Google IPv6 Randy Bush (Feb 25)
