nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 21:06:23 +0200
On 29 February 2016 at 17:40, Phil Bedard <bedard.phil () gmail com> wrote:
It would be interesting to get some data from vendors on what the actual limitation is. I know with some new platforms like the NCS 55XX from Cisco (BRCM Jericho) it has limited space for counters, but I don’t know if that contributes to its minimum 1:8000 Netflow sampling rate. The new PTX FPC supporting Netflow has a minimum of 1:1000.
Are they are doing netflow in HW at all? To me it sounds like they might be doing it in LC CPU and HW is only doing sampled punting. Which would explain the performance hit. I would be very surprised if Jericho could do netflow in HW. And I'm 100% sure PE chip can't do netflow in HW. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX, (continued)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nikolay Shopik (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX sthaug (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Phil Bedard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Avi Freedman (Feb 28)
