nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 10:54:08 -0700

On 3/13/16 7:31 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
In the end, google has made a choice. I think these kinds of choices will delay IPv6 adoption.  

Given that they publish AAAA records for a great deal of their services
I'm not sure how you would conclude that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Damien Burke [mailto:damien () supremebytes com] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:51 PM
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>; Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>; Dennis Burgess <dmburgess () linktechs 
net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: RE: Cogent - Google - HE Fun

Just received an updated statement from cogent support:

"We appreciate your concerns. This is a known issue that originates with Google as it is up to their discretion as to 
how they announce routes to us v4 or v6. 

Once again, apologies for any inconvenience."

And:

"The SLA does not cover route transit beyond our network. We cannot route to IPs that are not announced to us by the 
IP owner, directly or through a network peer."




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: