nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100g PCS Errors
From: "J. Hellenthal via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:16:22 -0500
Id hope by this point you’ve already reseated not only the card but the connection to the card as well ?. Possibly a faulty card.
On Aug 19, 2020, at 07:46, Nicholas Warren <nwarren () barryelectric com> wrote: We've got a 100g qsfp in an mx204 that has 1207 bit errors and 29666 errored blocks after 24 hours of just being linked up... I would assume this is not normal behavior, but I haven't used 100g before. Do others see high error rates on their 100g optics?
-- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- 100g PCS Errors Nicholas Warren (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Matt Harris (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Tom Beecher (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Aaron (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Clinton Work (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Saku Ytti (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 20)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Aug 19)
