nanog mailing list archives

Re: 100g PCS Errors

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:36:28 +0200



On 19/Aug/20 19:34, Clinton Work wrote:

What is the device on the other side of the MX204 100G link.   We've had some incrementing PCS errors on 100G links 
when the other side was a Juniper PTX1000 using port et-0/0/25.   Using a different port on the PTX1000 resolved the 
incrementing PCS errors.  We opened JTAC cases for two incidents and a root cause was never found.


Good to know, we are just about to start deploying a bunch of PTX1000's.

Mark.

Current thread:

100g PCS Errors Nicholas Warren (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Aug 19)
  - Re: 100g PCS Errors Matt Harris (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Tom Beecher (Aug 19)
  - Re: 100g PCS Errors Aaron (Aug 19)
- Re: 100g PCS Errors Clinton Work (Aug 19)
  - Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 19)
    - Re: 100g PCS Errors Saku Ytti (Aug 19)
    - Re: 100g PCS Errors Mark Tinka (Aug 20)