nanog mailing list archives
Re: Boston Telecom Hotels
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:17:31 -0400
For interconnection? Coresite and Markley. Equals if not soon to be
differentiated through Mass-IX being regional and Boston-IX not. As well as
costs, yield curves, power costs, etc. Boston is very much a ‘what do you
need’ location and not everything will work for everyone.
For true carrier hotels? 451 D Street, 230 Congress and 50 Post Office
Square. If you need help with that solution, reach out to me directly. I
will get you pointed in the right direction and the right people. These are
not enterprise plays unless you have deep fiber clue and want long term NNN
leases.
For Boston commodity data center? See {datacenterhawk, peeringDB}.
There is a solid core of Boston on this list. Catch us aksi on Twitter
@peeringforumNE or search engine = Boston Network Operators Group BOSNOG.
300 Bent is fiber rich. Never stood up as an interconnection site. Level 3
wasn’t neutral. 50 IB? Don’t think Internap was neutral per se, but someone
will correct me if I am wrong.
Cheers,
-M<
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 16:16 Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com>
wrote:
Does everyone agree that the 4 most important data centers are 1 Summer, Coresite, INAP, and 300 Bent Street. Both 1 Summer and Coresite clearly below in that group. Not sure about INAP and 300 Bent Street. Regards, Roderick. Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com New York City & Budapest rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com Budapest: 36-70-605-5144 NJ: 908-452-8183 [image: 1467221477350_image005.png]
Current thread:
- Boston Telecom Hotels Rod Beck (Aug 19)
- Re: Boston Telecom Hotels Jason Kuehl (Aug 19)
- Re: Boston Telecom Hotels Neil Hanlon (Aug 20)
- Re: Boston Telecom Hotels Rod Beck (Aug 21)
- Re: Boston Telecom Hotels Martin Hannigan (Aug 19)
- Re: Boston Telecom Hotels Jason Kuehl (Aug 19)
