nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:46:47 +0200
Many vendors are running on top of OpenWRT or Linux, and both of them have CLAT support.
Unfortunately, I can't give names which aren't already published, such as Sagemcom, D-Link, NEC and Technicolor.
Believe me there are others, you just need to ask them.
Mikrotik is the worst vendor for anything related to transition. They only run pure dual-stack, and even on that, they
are really bad. They even use a broken naming convention against the standards. They use 6to4 instead of 6in4, which
get a lot of folks confused ...
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 25/8/20 18:15, "NANOG en nombre de Mark Tinka" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en nombre de
mark.tinka () seacom com> escribió:
On 24/Aug/20 17:21, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> You probably mean 464XLAT ....
>
> Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even better.
>
> If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new boxes ... just something to think in the
future about those vendors.
>
> I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been
doing this for many customers. Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features.
If CLAT support were wide-spread, it would quickly accelerate the
deployment of IPv6 in broadband applications.
Not even Mikrotik are doing it, and they pretty much own the FTTH CPE
market in many countries.
If only CPE's could run Android, or Windows :-).
Mark.
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to
inform about this communication and delete it.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Tom Hill (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Owen DeLong (Aug 29)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mike Hammett (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
