nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:46:31 +0200
On 25/Aug/20 22:40, Brian Johnson wrote:
I usually solve this problem by designing for NAT444 and dual-stack. This solves both problems and allows for users to migrate as they are able/need to. If you try and force the change, you will loose users.
At some point, you run out of IPv4. You could cascade to a high degree of NAT444, but then it gets hairy, and costly, at some point. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Owen DeLong (Aug 29)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mike Hammett (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
