nanog mailing list archives

Re: MAP-T in production


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:52:52 -0700

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:18 PM Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us>
wrote:

Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking for
feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core design. My
concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network. The BR will have
to do overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only resources. The idea being
that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this will be a quicker “clean-up”
project than a dual-stack solution.

I have reviewed Jordan Gotlieb’s presentation from Charter and would love
to hear if this is still in use at Charter or if was ever fully implemented
and the experiences)


Does not loo like Charter moved the needle in the last few years

https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/CharterCommunications.png



I’d love any real life examples and success/failure stories.

Thanks.

- Brian

Current thread: