nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAP-T in production
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:52:52 -0700
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:18 PM Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us> wrote:
Has anyone implemented a MAP-T solution in production? I am looking for feedback on this as a deployment strategy for an IPv6 only core design. My concern is MAP-T CE stability and overhead on the network. The BR will have to do overloaded NAT anyway to access IPv4 only resources. The idea being that when IPv4 is no longer needed, this will be a quicker “clean-up” project than a dual-stack solution. I have reviewed Jordan Gotlieb’s presentation from Charter and would love to hear if this is still in use at Charter or if was ever fully implemented and the experiences)
Does not loo like Charter moved the needle in the last few years https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/CharterCommunications.png
I’d love any real life examples and success/failure stories. Thanks. - Brian
Current thread:
- MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Fred Baker (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: MAP-T in production Tom Hill (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brandon Martin (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Mark Tinka (Jul 26)
- Re: MAP-T in production Brian Johnson (Jul 27)
- Re: MAP-T in production Baldur Norddahl (Jul 27)
- Re: MAP-T in production Randy Bush (Jul 24)
- Re: MAP-T in production Fred Baker (Jul 22)
