Home page logo
/
firewall-wizards logo
Firewall Wizards Mailing List

Tips and tricks for firewall administrators

List Archives

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2013536
201211
2011221053407318
2010387108520142151613
20092533195373519291124256
2008305475694036142217102933
20074851915245321384913719554
20061631604273122875111550386718
2005161137864516715814945120477119
200410224613312222720921513614717697159
2003283158113215291161183127121177104115
2002211133981047568271245166349193144
20013051921711379710720580114142133
2000264358242233141111321244142100
1999152199244216264330328172211305377264
19987321579241170244186247269343149167
1997159194188202

Latest Posts

Re: Linked-in and its Phishing-like contacts option! lordchariot (May 01)
Yeah, I was trying to make this non-product specific, but most vendors can actually do this to some degree or another.

Here's how we do it on my product:

https://mcafee.box.com/MWG7-FeatureDemo-Part2

The problem with doing it at a network layer with an IDS is the SSL decryption. Almost everything nowadays is HTTPS, so
it's game over if you cannot open up the encryption.



_____________________________________

From:...

Re: Linked-in and its Phishing-like contacts option! Jon Robinson (May 01)
It's not free but Palo Alto Networks does this.You can search here to see
which applications/sites they can control:
http://apps.paloaltonetworks.com/applipedia/

Jon Robinson
Digital Scepter
desk (951) 461-7868
mobile (562) 682-0821
jon () digitalscepter com

Re: Linked-in and its Phishing-like contacts option! Mathew Want (May 01)
Read only access to the sites. I like that idea a lot.

Has anyone else come across this requirement or found a good way to do it
at a control point level? Perhaps at the IDS layer?

M@

Re: OpenBSD IPSEC VPN question Chris Buechler (May 01)
You can, but that's a different circumstance. That would be IPsec
transport mode, which in combination with gif, GRE or similar
tunneling indeed doesn't have such requirements/quirks since there is
a route in the routing table in that case. Tunnel mode is more common,
which is what's applicable to the subject of this thread. Routing
table changes have no impact on whether traffic in BSD traverses a
tunnel mode IPsec connection,...

Re: OpenBSD IPSEC VPN question Paul D. Robertson (May 01)
It's been a while since I've done it, but Linux used to make an ipsec0 interface that was handled with the standard
routing table. Possibly in *BSD you need to use a gre or gif tunnel to achieve the same thing?

Paul

Re: OpenBSD IPSEC VPN question Chris Buechler (May 01)
This is true of all the BSDs with IPsec (and maybe Linux and other
*nix OSes but not sure of those). Traffic that doesn't have a specific
source IP set gets the source IP that's closest to the destination per
the routing table. IPsec doesn't have a routing table entry, traffic
follows the SPD. So it ends up getting the IP that's nearest the
default gateway, which is most always a public IP, which is most
always not going to...

More Lists

Dozens of other network security lists are archived at SecLists.Org.


[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]