mailing list archives
Re: Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:52:10 +0200
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:59:48PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Georgi Guninski:
so you approve gaining pseudo credibility by practicing mouse copy/paste?
then this pseudo credibility leads to corporate serving/licking like:
"responsible disclosure rfc" - search for it.
not than coley is consistent at all (besides lacking completeness):
- The Board has agreed that CNAs should not reserve candidates for
people who do not practice responsible disclosure (candidates would
be assigned *after* publication). I hope that this document, or a
later version, will become part of the "definition" of responsible
Yes, this puzzles me too, but on the other hand, Debian became a CNA,
and Debian's official policy is geared away from "responsible
disclosure" -- all bug reports are supposed to be public.
i am surprised that the debian constitution allows participation in such
the open source crowd can easily setup a cross open vendor database and the
first one of the eleet them to learn of a bug to paste with the mouse.
but for strange reasons vendor-sec () lst de seems to like mitre.
where do you want bill gates to go today?
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics" Florian Weimer (Jan 07)
RE: location Randall M (Jan 07)
Re: location ad () heapoverflow com (Jan 07)
Re: Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics" Steven M. Christey (Jan 07)
- Re: Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics", (continued)