Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions?
From: White Vampire <whitevampire () mindless com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:27:43 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:59:23PM -0400, Stewart(bdlists () snerk org) wrote:
You could add a statement to your DocumentRoot section like so; RedirectPermanent "/~user" "http://user.blablah.com/" Which would force browsers to access the page via the 'proper' means, rather than via the back door. Besides; if a user has their own sub-domain, why would they want a tilde site anyways?
        As a backup regarding domain and/or DNS issues.  It can prove
quite useful, at least it has for me in the past.
        It should truly not be that much of an issue.  There are a
myriad of approaches for the authentication Apache provides.  .htaccess
is a good approach, and the most common method.
Regards,
- -- 
\   | \  /  White Vampire\Rem                |  http://gammaforce.org/
 \|\|  \/   whitevampire () mindless com        |  http://gammagear.com/
"Silly hacker, root is for administrators."  |  http://webfringe.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9rwEf3+rxmnEDyl8RArHBAJ9qNxcYZRBzq84yvXMMyo3HazIHsQCdEUZl
ZF+faJhiREWQs4SuQ8ektlU=
=OPT3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Eimantas V (Oct 15)
- Re[2]: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Benoît (Oct 16)
 
- <Possible follow-ups>
 - Re: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Mike Arnold (Oct 15)
- Re[2]: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Benoît (Oct 16)
- Re: Re[2]: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Mike Arnold (Oct 16)
 
 
 - Re[2]: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Benoît (Oct 16)
 - Re: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? White Vampire (Oct 16)
 - Re: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? Stewart (Oct 17)
- Re: Insecure handling of Apache restrictions? White Vampire (Oct 17)
 
 
 
