Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Spamarrest Was: Listener on ports 137, 138, 139
From: White Vampire <whitevampire () mindless com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:03:08 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:59:40PM +0100, Gary Axten(gary.axten () lineone net) wrote:
I received a mail in return for the one I sent to the list requesting me to click a link to verify I exist for anti spam purposes. The company looks legit, though I don't like html mail... Does anyone other than the sender have any experience or views of this or similar companies ?
        I personally like a proactive approach on the ISP's part, such
as open relay checking and maintaining a local blacklist.
        There are other approaches too, I am trying to decide exactly
what to implement on one of my servers right now.
        The "tagged message" method is a reasonable method, but not
exactly the most polite thing for things such as mailing lists.  If
everyone used that, people would conceivably receive thousands every
post they sent to a mailing list.  There are other downsides to it.
        (see: http://tmda.net/)
Regards,
- -- 
\   | \  /  White Vampire\Rem                |  http://gammaforce.org/
 \|\|  \/   whitevampire () mindless com        |  http://gammagear.com/
"Silly hacker, root is for administrators."  |  http://webfringe.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9r2vc3+rxmnEDyl8RAkaeAKDjjw5fYo0cEysr119HQw5jjwZilQCfaRwt
OCGXCN6u99dDTZVX0HLrJho=
=G83A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Spamarrest Was: Listener on ports 137, 138, 139 Gary Axten (Oct 17)
- Re: Spamarrest Was: Listener on ports 137, 138, 139 White Vampire (Oct 18)
 
 
