Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: CGI security vs ASP security

From: Jens Porup <jens () cyber com au>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:55:16 +1000

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:52:19PM -0400, Teodorski, Chris wrote:

I am looking for some opinions on whether ASP is inherently more
secure than CGI? Or is it just easier to implement ASP
securely......and securing CGI takes work and knowledge.......


CGI is a protocol, ASP is a language... ASP is a crap Microsoft product
I wouldn't use to add one and one.... if by CGI you mean Perl, then yes,
Perl is a *good thing*






-------------------------------------------------------------------
Is SPAM over-loading your e-mail server, disk space or bandwidth?
SurfControl E-Mail Filter is flexible, intelligent and policy-driven
protection.
http://www.securityfocus.com/SurfControl-security-basics2
Download your free fully functional trial, complete with 30-days of free technical support.
Stop SPAM before it stops you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Current thread:

CGI security vs ASP security Teodorski, Chris (Apr 11)
- Re: CGI security vs ASP security Jens Porup (Apr 14)
  - Re: CGI security vs ASP security Corey Schaffer (Apr 15)
  - RE: CGI security vs ASP security David Gillett (Apr 15)
  - RE: CGI security vs ASP security Sarbjit Singh Gill (Apr 17)
  - Re: CGI security vs ASP security Steven J. Sobol (Apr 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CGI security vs ASP security Rodriguez, Manuel (Apr 15)
- RE: CGI security vs ASP security Kline, Nathan C - CIEP-3 (Apr 15)
  - Re: CGI security vs ASP security Jens Porup (Apr 16)
    - RE: CGI security vs ASP security Jon Pastore (Apr 17)
- RE: CGI security vs ASP security Kline, Nathan C - CIEP-3 (Apr 17)