Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: VPN Question
From: "Gabriel Orozco" <gabriel_orozco () mx sumida com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 18:14:09 -0500
This is due to the kind of VPN you are using. by design, IPSec does not allow any of both peers to be behind a NAT. there are some ways to overcome the problem, but they work mostly when the NATed end is known and you have a way to overpass the problem. behind a NAT in a hotel, it will be a problem. why don't you try PPTP, or better, a box with OpenVPN running over Linux, OpenVPN works using a high UDP port, and the good news are they have ported it to Win32 (Currently WinXP,2000,NT). this way, your "Road Warriors" will be able to connect from nearly everywhere without problems. And what about licenses? here they cost 0.00 .. dificult to beat for one of the best SSL/TLS based VPN's out there in the marked, isn't it? ;-) We had to trash a Sonicwall box in favor of a Linux box because we were unable to route two big networks properly. They finally let me put a Linux solution and we have now more than six months without problems. this was network to network, but I use openvpn myself, along with pptp, and they work eveywhere. http://www.openvpn.org Best Regards Gabriel ----- Original Message ----- From: "DeGennaro, Gregory" <Gregory_DeGennaro () csaa com> To: "Jim Brezicky" <brezicky () infimed com>; <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: RE: VPN Question
Jim, This is a hotel issue. If it works in some and not in others, it means in this case that the source is the problem. Unless you have round robin VPN IP addresses and your users do not know what the IPs are? Which I highly doubt and why would you want to do this? Regards, Greg DeGennaro Jr., CCNP Security Analyst -----Original Message----- From: Jim Brezicky [mailto:brezicky () infimed com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:29 AM To: security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: VPN Question Good afternoon all, This posting is a little off track, but I'm hoping someone can help me anyway. I have a SonicWall Pro230 and I'm trying to do VPN with it. My users connect from some locations and not others. Example: They could connect from the Airport in Cincinnati, but not the airport in Las Vegas. Seems they can't connect in many (if any hotels). In speaking with SonicWall they said this is a known issue when connecting through a firewall on the hotel side. I know I'm not the first company to try this, and was wondering how others get by this issue? Or is this an inherent SonicWall issue. Most of my users are traveling Sales people, and will go all around the US, and Japan. Any insight would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks, Jim Brezicky InfiMed Inc --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training Federal, September 29-30 (Training), October 1-2 (Briefings) in Tysons Corner, VA; the world's premier technical IT security event. Modeled after the famous Black Hat event in Las Vegas! 6 tracks, 12 training sessions, top speakers and sponsors. Symantec is the Diamond sponsor. Early-bird registration ends September
6.Visit us: www.blackhat.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training Federal, September 29-30 (Training), October 1-2 (Briefings) in Tysons Corner, VA; the world's premier technical IT security event. Modeled after the famous Black Hat event in Las Vegas! 6 tracks, 12 training sessions, top speakers and sponsors. Symantec is the Diamond sponsor. Early-bird registration ends September 6.Visit us: www.blackhat.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- VPN Question Jim Brezicky (Aug 22)
- RE: VPN Question Lucas Zaichkowsky (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question David Gillett (Aug 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: VPN Question DeGennaro, Gregory (Aug 22)
- Re: VPN Question Gabriel Orozco (Aug 25)
- Re: VPN Question yankl (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question Burton M. Strauss III (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question Dana Smith (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question chort (Aug 25)
- Re: VPN Question Schneider Sebastian (Aug 25)
- FW: VPN Question Atmavidya, Ananda (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question Sinha, Amitabh (Amit) (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question George Peek (Aug 25)
- RE: VPN Question David Burt (Aug 26)
- RE: VPN Question Larry Thompson (Aug 27)
(Thread continues...)
