Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: HTTPS vs encrypted frames in HTTP
From: Eloi Granado <eloi.granado () millorsoft net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:22:48 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 17 December 2003 20:12, Sasha wrote:
Bottom line: Should I be worried about this?If you concerned with network interception -- NO.
The question is: can you always *easily* check you are accessing the encrypted frame? No. You must get to the frame properties dialog to check it. Everytime. This is a BAD user interface design. Fake the outer frameset (as it travels unencrypted/unsigned) and you can fake the inner frame without the user noticing it. But, if the user sees the https: in the location bar he knows the frameset is reliable, and thus if everything else is https too everything is reliable. So yes, it is a bad design, and of an "insecure" nature. - -- - ----------------------------------------------------- Eloi Granado (eloi () millorsoft es) PGP Key: http://eloi.millorsoft.es/pgp-publickey.asc - ----------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/4XHoewfs1FO2wi0RAsWWAJsGBFb7W8vjiIkg/DYHCcAu7sZN8gCgvp8j mvLZy+8EHpUpG2V6iEGtIuM= =4d4R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- HTTPS vs encrypted frames in HTTP b00 dog41 (Dec 17)
- Re: HTTPS vs encrypted frames in HTTP Sasha (Dec 17)
- Re: HTTPS vs encrypted frames in HTTP Eloi Granado (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: HTTPS vs encrypted frames in HTTP Shawn Jackson (Dec 17)
- Re: HTTPS vs encrypted frames in HTTP Sasha (Dec 17)
