Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification
From: GB Clark <gclarkii () vsservices com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:40:40 -0600
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 09:53:23 -0600 Ned Fleming <ned () kaw us> wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 22:11:49 +0000, oobs3c02 () attbi com wrote:Thanks for the input on this so far. To clarify, John65 () pobox com is exactly right in stating that I'm trying to stop the spoofing of my domain as the sender to my own domain (e.g. helpdesk@xyz to johnSmith@xyz where helpdesk is the spoofed sender). This is not an open relay server and the spam is not (as far as I can tell) as a result of any viruses guessing at accounts.[snip]I'm not sure that this problem can be resolved within sendmail config files but if anyone knows differently, please let me know.Yes, you can do this in Sendmail. You can do just about anything in Sendmail, provided you're willing to read and write hieroglyphics, uh, I mean the config files. The fellows who recommended SMTP AUTH or pop-before-smtp were correct.
Neither simple pop-before-smtp or SMTP AUTH will do it. It will take authentication
(either AUTH or IP) plus a filter to stop what he wants. It won't be pretty whichever
way. Now a semi-simple milter can modify the subject line to warn the receiver that
it might be forged. That would be easy; for a sendmail hacker, that is.
GB
--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
gclarkii () VSServices COM | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?
Current thread:
- RE: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification oobs3c02 (Jan 06)
- RE: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification john65 (Jan 07)
- Re: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification GB Clark (Jan 07)
- Re: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification Ned Fleming (Jan 07)
- Re: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification GB Clark (Jan 08)
- Re: Sendmail 8.11 configuration/security issue - some clarification theog (Jan 09)
