Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Cisco Workaround
From: "Wolfpaw - Dale Corse" <admin-lists () wolfpaw net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:03:25 -0600
Be aware - the hack is a Denial of Service attack, and it can be accomplished with ANY ONE of these protocols, there is no special combination required. Call Cisco TAC and they will give you updated software for your device, which voids the need for the ACL. Regards, D. -------------------------------- Dale Corse System Administrator Wolfpaw Services Inc. http://www.wolfpaw.net (780) 474-4095
-----Original Message----- From: DOUGLAS GULLETT [mailto:dougg03 () comcast net] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:16 PM To: Alvaro Gordon-Escobar Cc: firewalls () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Cisco Workaround I don't think you have to put all the access-list in. I believe that the hack requires a certain combination of packets to the four ports, so leaving one or two of them open should still prevent the hack. That might be a good question for Cisco TAC...they should be willing to help even if you "misplaced" your SmartNet contract information. ;-) Doug ----- Original Message ----- From: Alvaro Gordon-Escobar <alvaroge () molecularstaging com> Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:15 am Subject: Cisco Workaroundwill this access list modification prevent my internal DNS server from updates to it self from my telco's DNS server? access-list 101 deny 53 any any access-list 101 deny 55 any any access-list 101 deny 77 any any access-list 101 deny 103 any any !--- insert any other previously applied ACL entries here !--- you must permit other protocols through to allow normal !--- traffic -- previously defined permit lists will work !--- or you may use the permit ip any any shown here access-list 101 permit ip any any Thanks in advance ~alvaro Escobar-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco Workaround, (continued)
- RE: Cisco Workaround David Gillett (Jul 28)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Naman Latif (Jul 23)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Todd Mitchell - lists (Jul 23)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Charlie Winckless (Jul 23)
- Re: Cisco Workaround DOUGLAS GULLETT (Jul 23)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Terry Baranski (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround Paul Kincaid (Jul 24)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Dave Gilmore (Intrusense) (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround Kurt Seifried (Jul 24)
- RE: Cisco Workaround David Gillett (Jul 24)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Wolfpaw - Dale Corse (Jul 24)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Byrne Ghavalas (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround john (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround joshua sahala (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround Jac (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround Luis Enrique Londono (Jul 23)
- Re: Cisco Workaround bryan_khoo (Jul 24)
- RE: Cisco Workaround dave kleiman (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround igenge2 (Jul 24)
- Re: Cisco Workaround Stephane Nasdrovisky (Jul 24)
- RE: Cisco Workaround Jofre, Sebastian (Jul 24)
(Thread continues...)
