Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Linux/windows remote authentication
From: "David M. Fetter" <david.fetter () fetterconsulting com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:10:14 -0800
Better yet try LDAP LDAP is better then NIS and NT supports it in a way (active directory). Plus LDAP is a lot more powerfull then NIS but harder to configure in my opinion (maybe because I have worked with NIS soo long it's second nature to setup a NIS environment) LDAP is the future however.
To add onto this, try LDAP with kerberos. This will provide you with an added layer of security and it would essentially create one location (being LDAP) where you have to administrate users. As opposed to two different ones with Samba and NIS.
-- David M. Fetter - http://www.fetterconsulting.com/"The world is full of power and energy and a person can go far by just skimming off a tiny bit of it." Neal Stephenson - Snow Crash
------------------------------------------------------------------- SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam, viruses and malicious code. Safeguard your business critical communications. Download a free 30-day trial: http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfsbl1
Current thread:
- Linux/windows remote authentication DevilKin (Mar 24)
- Re: Linux/windows remote authentication brian_carpio (Mar 24)
- Re: Linux/windows remote authentication David M. Fetter (Mar 25)
- Re: Linux/windows remote authentication brian_carpio (Mar 26)
- Re: Linux/windows remote authentication David M. Fetter (Mar 26)
- Re: Linux/windows remote authentication David M. Fetter (Mar 25)
- Re: Linux/windows remote authentication brian_carpio (Mar 24)
