Security Basics mailing list archives
Military and Wireless (Was: wireless policies)
From: Alessandro <a.bottonelli () infinito it>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:46:03 +0100
On Friday 14 November 2003 20:56, Steve wrote:
Tactical field units like the 82nd Airborne make use of wireless networks that are not necessarily authorized and can likely easily be hacked. Yes - I am somewhat off topic.
Don't think we are going off topic that much. Actually when I discovered my client is using wireless networks (unauthorized!) I generated a lot of discussion at the higher ranks. Never thought of a wireless network as a "search and destroy" mean for a tactical weapon, but that's indeed a consideration. Although the Spread Spectrum technology makes it harder to use the radio waves as a radio beacon for such a purpose... I suppose... More pragmatically, I believe military networks (even unclassified) and wireless is an oxymoron altoghether, yet there may be situations where you have no choice, that's a why a policy governing the issue is a must, rather than leaving it unleashed. -- Alessandro Bottonelli CISSP, BS7799 Lead Auditor www.axis-net.it
----- Original Message ----- From: "Meritt James" <meritt_james () bah com> To: "Alessandro Bottonelli" <a.bottonelli () axis-net it> Cc: <security-basics () securityfocus com>; <netethix () iprimus com au> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:49 PM Subject: Re: wireless policies In my PERSONAL view (having retired from the military after 20 years), I would not want to be associated with a broadcast unit in a tactical environment which would provide targetting information. That it was encrypted would not matter to an anti-radiation missile. Alessandro Bottonelli wrote:I am supporting a military client of mine on a very similar task.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs by up to 80%. FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial - http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- wireless policies netethix (Nov 11)
- Re: wireless policies Steve (Nov 13)
- Re: wireless policies Alessandro Bottonelli (Nov 13)
- Re: wireless policies Meritt James (Nov 14)
- Re: wireless policies Steve (Nov 16)
- Military and Wireless (Was: wireless policies) Alessandro (Nov 17)
- Re: wireless policies Meritt James (Nov 14)
- Re: wireless policies Tomas Wolf (Nov 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: wireless policies Hagen, Eric (Nov 13)
- Re: Re: wireless policies cdirricq (Nov 16)
