
Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: switched n/w
From: Rino Mardo <joroxx () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:14:31 +0300
how did your users came to that conclusion? On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:24 +0530, kaushal <kaushal () rocsys com> wrote:
Hi, Iam a bit new to network securities.We have a switched network and to my knowledge a hosts' data cannot be sniffed by other host by runnning tcpdump.But Iam receiving complaints from few users that their data is being changed/manipulated.Is this possible? How can I avoid this at the host level?Does this mean the server has been compromised?Any help or pointer in this aspect would be highly appreciated. thanks in advance. kaushal.
-- "Every morning, I get up and look through the 'Forbes' list of the richest people in America. If I'm not there, I go to work" -- Robert Orben
Current thread:
- switched n/w kaushal (Dec 07)
- RE: switched n/w David Gillett (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w the.soylent (Dec 08)
- RE: switched n/w Rishi Pande (Dec 08)
- RE: switched n/w Chris Cirullo (Dec 09)
- Re: switched n/w Rino Mardo (Dec 08)
- Message not available
- Re: switched n/w Gautam R. Singh (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w M. Shirk (Dec 09)
- Re: switched n/w Gautam R. Singh (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w Andreas Putzo (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w Alexander Klimov (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w Grim (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w Jacob Weeks (Dec 08)
- Re: switched n/w q q (Dec 09)
- Re: switched n/w easternerd (Dec 10)
- Re: switched n/w q q (Dec 09)
- Re: switched n/w xyberpix (Dec 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: switched n/w Jeff Gercken (Dec 08)