
Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Would you pay more ...
From: John Fastabend <jfastabe () up edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Would you pay more to only have the following destination ports open to the internet originating from your broadband modem: tcp 21 - ftp tcp 22 - ssh tcp 25 - smtp tcp, udp 53 - dns tcp 80 - www tcp 110 - pop3 tcp 119 - nntp udp 123 - ntp tcp 443 - secure wwwJeff, A easy no. Because of grandma. Your missing the end user experience. I've had Popeye and olive oil neighbors who came back from the mall with a gateway, called up road runner and invited me over for pizza. By the second slice they had asked is this the net? 3 or 4 times. I stopped back for more pizza a few weeks later .. she was on some talk pal thing talking to who knows who where about quilts, he showed me all his WWII buddies he found , their ship www sites and then fired off his WWII flight game, gift from daughter, connected to a game zone, joined a private squadron [no cheats] and proceeded to shootem up over a decent rendering of the French country side .. complete with call signs and wise crack messaging. These two did not have a clue about port numbers or protocols nor did they care. They were all concerned about the web news they were reading regarding their machine being attacked by bad guys on the net. Kind of like going to the bad side of town to a wild bar .. great fun but need to get back to the car with out being mugged. With your Idea .. what are they to do ? How does one teach them, work with them ? Are you saying they should all wear the same generic clothes because fun clothes are hard to take care of ? 1984 ? Pass me the soma. /don
Many ISP have already whittled away allot of the features of being connected such as having to pay to setup a web page or connect to a shell. To restrict port usage just seems like another annoyance for more experienced users and doesn't help the everyday surfers at all. Soon what will we be allowed? Only time slots of bandwidth or only filtered usage. Paying more for less ports would be like paying more for a front drive pick-up then a four wheel drive pickup. Not that you should start charging more for normal service though. That would be outrageous. john --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Would you pay more ... Jeff (Jul 05)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Charley Hamilton (Jul 06)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Steve (Jul 07)
- Re: Would you pay more ... John Fastabend (Jul 12)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Joe Barrett (Jul 06)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Florian Streck (Jul 06)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Harrison Gladden (Jul 07)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Dave Dearinger (Jul 07)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Calin Don (Jul 08)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Don Voss (Jul 09)
- Re: Would you pay more ... John Fastabend (Jul 12)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Don Voss (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Would you pay more ... Mosley, Larry (Jul 06)
- RE: Would you pay more ... Nick Benigno (Jul 07)
- RE: Would you pay more ... Steven Trewick (Jul 07)
- Re: Would you pay more ... Charley Hamilton (Jul 06)