
Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Firewall Basics
From: Miles Stevenson <mstevenson () sans org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:03:45 -0400
Greetings Jennifer. I assume that your "service" network and your "production" network are not connected to each other, and you are wondering if you should use the same brand of firewall (Cisco PIX) for your new "service" network. It is true that there can be security gains from diversity. One of the biggest examples of this can been seen with the hords of Microsoft Windows related viruses and worms wreaking havoc on the entire internet from time to time, simply because so many people are using the same platform. As far as firewalls are concerened, there are some schools of thought who recommend 2 layers of firewalls that are separate platforms (i.e., maybe putting a *nix based firewall behind your PIX firewall). The idea is that if there is a network stack vulnerability in one firewall, then the same vulnerability probably won't be found in the other. I generally don't like this idea at all. One of the biggest reasons is that you now have to maintain 2 firewall rulesets in 2 different syntax languages. I would be much more worried about vulnerabilities in my firewall configuration at this point than in the network stack of the firewall itself. My advice, is simply to use what you know best. If you know the PIX platform well, then stick with it. It will simplify your setup, and minimize user related errors that open up new holes in your network. On Wednesday 21 July 2004 11:18 am, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
Hi all: I am designing a "service" network that is separate from our "production" network. Our web sites, email server, etc will be utilizing this network; whereas, internet traffic and vpn traffic will utilize the other. My question is in regards to firewalls. Currently, I am using a PIX for my production network. From what I have been hearing, it is recommended to use two different firewall vendors in this situation. Is this a general consensus with all of you? Or do you think having another pix would be ok? Thanks for any info! Kind Regards, Jennifer --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
-- Miles D. Stevenson The SANS Institute Network Operations Center mstevenson () sans org --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Firewall Basics Jennifer Fountain (Jul 21)
- SV: Firewall Basics Kim Guldberg (Jul 22)
- Re: Firewall Basics NSC (Jul 22)
- Re: Firewall Basics Miles Stevenson (Jul 22)
- RE: Firewall Basics David Gillett (Jul 22)
- RE: Firewall Basics J.Ayoola (Jul 22)
- Re: Firewall Basics jon rodman (Jul 23)
- Re: Firewall Basics Miles Stevenson (Jul 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Firewall Basics eip (Jul 26)