Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re:
From: GuidoZ <uberguidoz () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 22:53:14 -0700
PHP, Perl, and Python have all been discussed. Python is out of the question because the company who did the ActiveX scripting for them is the ones who are going to do whatever NEW scripting is done. They don't do Python at all. PHP and Perl are more of an option. I'd lean more towards Perl, as it would likely port better from their current programming. It seems like PHP would be basically a new coding session from scratch. (Or am I mistaken?) The reason they seemed somewhat hot for Java is because they also do Java programming for other companies. While they have done Perl in the past, they are strongest with ActiveX and Java. So, Java seemed like the likely alternative to ActiveX... I just wanted to make sure I wasn't forgetting something, as it might of not been the best. =) Thanks for the suggestion - I'll remind them of it again and see what they say. -- Peace. ~G On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 20:12:55 +0100, xyberpix <xyberpix () xyberpix com> wrote:
Hi GuidoZ, I do stand corrected on this one, but what about PHP? Maybe it's not possible, but it may be worth a look at least? xyberpix On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 07:39, GuidoZ wrote::) Java... dunno how much better that is than WSH, other than the fact it's multi-platform, at least... :))) *duck*Yeah, I'd recommend ducking... that could fuel some flames. =) I'm open to other ideas too from anyone - the situation in a nutshell is an orgranization I support needs to migrate away from IE. (The users really can't handle the spyware and such, no matter how hard I try to educate and prevent.) The only thing holding them back from switching is a proprietary ActiveX application that they use to interface with their data warehouse. Changing companies isn't a possibility. I've complained at them before for offering an IE only solution (there are a few Linux systems as well which results to using WINE; though unstable). They've always argued that it works... however with the recent onslaught on IE vulnerabilities and complaints from OTHER netadmins, they are changing their toon finally. They are currently working on a java interface instead. The WSH option was also on their minds, although I pointed out this limits to Windows again... and isn't that much better. Thoughts? Java will at least be cross platform and cross browser, which is really all I'm after. However, I'm sure it has it's drawbacks, though I'm not a java programmer so I don't know what they might be off-hand. Lookign for ideas from the group. =) -- Peace. ~G On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:38:42 -0400, Glenn Sieb <ges () wingfoot org> wrote:GuidoZ said the following on 10/7/2004 2:26 AM:=D I think I already posted my replies, so I'll save doing it a 2nd time. lol Thanks for bringing it here too.:) I saw you doing it and figured I'd bring it back over too... :)Followup on your WSH idea: They are looking into it. Actually, me bringing up my dislike as ActiveX being the only thing holding back from going IE-Free was just enough to have them look at it again. They are looking into using java instead of ActiveX. (!!!! yay !!!!)WSH isn't perfect, but it's at least less-evil than ActiveX.Now all I'm doing is waiting to see what they come up with. The WSH isn't completely dead, although they admitted that it would most likely be written for IE too. The java applet they create instead would be cross platform AND cross browser. Thanks for the push to get on them again!! I think it might work this time.:) Java... dunno how much better that is than WSH, other than the fact it's multi-platform, at least... :))) *duck* Best, G. -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759-- For Security and Open Source news: http://xyberpix.demon.co.uk
Current thread:
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned', (continued)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned' Glenn Sieb (Oct 04)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned' GuidoZ (Oct 05)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned' GuidoZ (Oct 05)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: GuidoZ (Oct 06)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: Glenn Sieb (Oct 06)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: Glenn Sieb (Oct 06)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: GuidoZ (Oct 07)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: Glenn Sieb (Oct 08)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: GuidoZ (Oct 08)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: xyberpix (Oct 08)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: GuidoZ (Oct 12)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 08)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: GuidoZ (Oct 12)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Oct 13)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: GuidoZ (Oct 15)
- Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned' GuidoZ (Oct 04)
