Security Basics mailing list archives
SV: Client End Firewalls
From: "Kim Guldberg" <kim () bufferzone dk>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:07:08 +0200
IMHO they provide much needed security in combination with a bastion firewall, if you choose the right one. Most personal firewalls filter on the basis of applications and processes on the client machine. Without this type of firewall, a Trojan using legal traffic will get past a bastion firewall. With a personal firewall the user will be prompted to allow the traffic before it is allowed to leave the net. Remember that most hackers do not break in to the network, they use a vulnerability to make the network break out. The right personal firewall will prevent this. If you are looking into this type of firewall, I would recommend that you look at the BitGuard firewall. This firewall is implemented as a service giving extra security and if you buy the server version, the administrator can control what applications and processes the clients are allowed to run. With this setup your clients can download Kazaa, but not install it and if kazaa is already installed they can't start it. -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Grant.Orchard () aws aust com [mailto:Grant.Orchard () aws aust com] Sendt: 28. september 2004 06:28 Til: security-basics () securityfocus com Emne: Client End Firewalls Hi guys, How much protection do you believe client side firewalls provide? My boss has asked for my thoughts on a system like Zone Labs are now offering. Can anyone provide me with their thoughts on what benefits this actually provides? Many thanks Grant Orchard NOTICE - This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. It may contain privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose it without the written authorisation of AWS. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact AWS by return e-mail and then delete both messages. AWS does not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.
Current thread:
- Client End Firewalls Grant . Orchard (Sep 29)
- Re: Client End Firewalls Steve (Sep 30)
- Re: Client End Firewalls GuidoZ (Sep 30)
- RE: Client End Firewalls Brent Clark (Sep 30)
- SV: Client End Firewalls Kim Guldberg (Sep 30)
- Re: Client End Firewalls David Parsons (Sep 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Client End Firewalls Shawn Jackson (Sep 30)
