Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: SOX Compliance and assesment
From: "mr.happy" <sadplanet () chello be>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:24:17 +0100
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 10:42 -0500, aixroot () mindspring com wrote:
I will simply say this: My company has recently worked on SOX for '04. I will say that we had nothing but exasperation while working with PwC ( Price Waterhouse Cooper) as they were our Consultants. They had little more knowledge of anything other than to ask "is this a mainframe or a server thingy". Even after telling them we only have two mainframes they continued to ask. They made the difficult task much harder and far more expensive than necessary.
We worked with Deloitte. Although they did understand our infrastructure, I did not have a very confident feeling of the SOX knowledge of the consultants. Too many times they didn't know the answer or assumed(?) it was a certain way. Perhaps this is because SOX is still new, still it shouldn't be an excuse. greets, DD -- Wiggle your big toe.
Current thread:
- SOX Compliance and assesment aixroot (Jan 14)
- Re: SOX Compliance and assesment mr.happy (Jan 17)
- Re: SOX Compliance and assesment Cory Foy (Jan 18)
- Re: SOX Compliance and assesment mr.happy (Jan 17)
