Security Basics mailing list archives
wireless internal vs external
From: William Stegman <stegmanw () comcast net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:47:55 -0400
fter researching wireless security, and testing deployment of an internal wireless solution, that is wireless connected to the corporate LAN, and external wireless, an AP connected to the Internet, I’m convinced the internal solution is the most secure. The problem is that the “higher ups” are not convinced. My rationale is that using eap/tls with tkip or aes on an aironet 1200 provides much more security and scalability than using a lniksys that sits on the Internet. I can create access-lists on the aironet to prevent unauthorized attempts to the http protocol, vlans, and it has VoIP capability. The biggest problem with the outside wireless solution is that it is using WEP, and if I’m connected to my LAN and then also connect to the outside, I’ve essentially turned my laptop into a gateway that offers very little firewall protection, zonelabs is installed on most laptops. So, does anyone have any experience or opinion I can consider? I feel that the “inside wireless solution” has had a sort of unjustified boogeyman aura to it, but perhaps someone else has some further insight. Thank you, /William Stegman - Network Administrator/ TransCore - Hummelstown
Current thread:
- wireless internal vs external William Stegman (Jul 18)
- RE: wireless internal vs external Burton Strauss (Jul 20)
- RE: wireless internal vs external David Gillett (Jul 20)
- RE: wireless internal vs external Dean De Beer (Jul 20)
