Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: GIAC Dilution
From: Daniel Miessler <daniel () dmiessler com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:01:45 -0500
On Mar 24, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Aman Raheja wrote:
GIAC will probably becaome equivalent to the Security+.
Not a chance, guy. Despite the dropping of the practical (which I'm not a fan of), the technical tests (plural) for the GSEC were still *very* difficult compared to CISSP, Security+, MCSE, or any other test I have taken. The stuff was quite technical and those without a strong background will not do well on the tests as they exist today.
I am not sure how they match up on content or level of knowledge required.
It's fairly stout stuff. Think CISSP, but technical.I think SANS will keep a decent degree of respect in the certification arena, just not as much as when they had the practical requirement. That's my hope anyway...
-- Daniel Miessler, CISSP, GSEC Email: daniel () dmiessler com Web: http://dmiessler.com GPG Key ID: 316BC712
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- GIAC Dilution Andy Cuff [Talisker] (Mar 17)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Grant . Orchard (Mar 18)
- RE: GIAC Dilution Brad Moldenhauer (Mar 18)
- Re: GIAC Dilution cc (Mar 18)
- Re: GIAC Dilution adeel hussain (Mar 21)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Aman Raheja (Mar 23)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Vladamir (Mar 24)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Aman Raheja (Mar 24)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Vladamir (Mar 24)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Daniel Miessler (Mar 28)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Michael Bartha (Mar 29)
- Re: GIAC Dilution adeel hussain (Mar 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: GIAC Dilution Don Parker (Mar 18)
- RE: GIAC Dilution Depp, Dennis M. (Mar 24)
- RE: GIAC Dilution Paris E. Stone (Mar 24)
- RE: GIAC Dilution Joshua Berry (Mar 24)
- Re: GIAC Dilution Don Parker (Mar 28)
- RE: GIAC Dilution Matthew Jenkins (Mar 28)
- RE: GIAC Dilution Charlie Winckless (Mar 28)
