Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP
From: Tomasz Nidecki <tonid () hakin9 org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:54:14 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: MD5 Thursday, November 3, 2005, 4:56:23 PM, brandon wrote:
If I telnet to a system on the internet and perform the following:
telnet target 25 EHLO (assuming Exchange) MAIL FROM: someone RCPT TO: someone_else () TargetDomain com DATA ....
The server will happily forward my mail to the internal mailbox without validating anything. I did not have to authenticate, I did not even have to provide a real sender on the system, I could make one up. Again, I know this is a common issue, the question is how can I prevent this from happening?
I know there were many answers already, and I'm not sure I understand the situation well, but: 1. if "TargetDomain.com" is your LOCAL domain, this is what's supposed to happen. You cannot set it up any other way, or other mailservers will not be able to send any mail to your domain. ANY mail, from ANY sender and ANY IP should be accepted [unless filtered, eg. by spam or virus protection] for your LOCAL domains. 2. if "TargetDomain.com" is an external domain, there are a couple of things to consider. 2.1. If the "target" is your mailserver's external IP and you're connecting from the Internet to your mailserver, your mailserver is an open relay and I suggest you fix this ASAP, or else you'll end up on blocking lists [DNSBL]. You should not accept ANY mail to external domains, if the connection is from the outside. If you have roaming users, you will have to set up some kind of authentication, such as SMTP AUTH or POP BEFORE SMTP. Sorry, can't help you with Exchange, I'm a qmail admin myself... 2.2. If the "target" is your mailserver's internal IP and you're connecting from the inside of your network, this is not a bad thing to happen, but it is not required for the mailserver to work correctly. It's quite often that internal networks relay all mail from their users without authentication. We use that setup in our company for example. 2.3. If you're afraid of mail spoofing by your users in your internal network, you may turn off relaying without authentication and require authentication by every user, even in your internal network. However, I don't know whether exchange adds this information [authenticated user name] to mail headers. Most mailserver's dont. qmail luckily does [at least the most popular SMTP AUTH patch does]. If Exchange doesn't, there's no use to implement this at all, because even if a user authenticates, he/she can still give ANY mail address both in MAIL FROM and in the From: header in mail. The only thing that would show who sent the mail in reality would be either the IP address [if they're fixed] or the authenticated user name [in the headers, if Exchange supports this]. Hope this is a bit helpful, still... - -- Tomasz Nidecki, Sekr. Redakcji / Managing Editor hakin9 magazine http://www.hakin9.org mailto:tonid () hakin9 org jid:tonid () tonid net Do you know what "hacker" means? http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html Czy wiesz, co znaczy slowo "haker"? http://www.jtz.org.pl/Inne/hacker-howto-pl.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6 iQCVAwUAQ28WOUR7PdagQ735AQE84wP6A9BxbVSppJozi7Iav1VEA513kvgUyXhV K6eOXgk2sdDyTwKYSmfNak2UwTJjkBVndaKBVnF7cVcV67MljYmd0RIYGtF1rrcY pw4DnHMQHN6MpuDmKXwXrBvg0DscHFUGbk63ibRbSL+xI34WyYv83dSWSffCx2Aw aNMr4q8cBM0= =bpXx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP, (continued)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Thierry Zoller (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP dallas jordan (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP FocusHacks (Nov 04)
- RE: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Muhammad Naseer Bhatti (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Gaddis, Jeremy L. (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Florian Streck (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Barrie Dempster (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Yousef Syed (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Tomasz Nidecki (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Tomasz Nidecki (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP jlopez2k5 (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP jalbuquerque (Nov 04)
- RE: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Tim Ballingall (Nov 04)
- RE: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Craig Wright (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP brandon . steili (Nov 04)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Pranav Lal (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Nov 07)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Pranav Lal (Nov 09)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Chris Moody (Nov 10)
- Re: Sender Spoofing via SMTP Pranav Lal (Nov 07)
- RE: Sender Spoofing via SMTP David Gillett (Nov 07)
