Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Different terms for the same or more secure?
From: "Robert D. Holtz - Lists" <robert.d.holtz () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:38:15 -0500
Yes ... secondary's have been around for some time now. From recollection you can have up to nine per interface. We used to have to do this for older DEC equipment. Way back in time DEC gear didn't support VLSM and you had to drop a bunch of class c subnets onto an interface to get around this. At least this was the method we chose. -----Original Message----- From: David Gillett [mailto:gillettdavid () fhda edu] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:46 PM To: 'Anhtuan Huynh'; eliterhythm () gmail com; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Different terms for the same or more secure?
-----Original Message----- From: Anhtuan Huynh [mailto:anhtuan.huynh () inttra com] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 2:29 PM To: 'eliterhythm () gmail com'; security-basics () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? no true. you can only have one subnet per vlan, however, private vlan can be used to further isolate the vlans. also if your using a switch with l3 capability, intervlan routing can be used (SVI). 192.168.1.0/24 = VLAN 10 192.168.2.0/24 = VLAN 11 you can't have 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 on VLAN 10. VLAN is a L2 not L3, therefore seperating the broadcast domain independantly.
You can, actually; Cisco router configuration calls these "secondary" addresses. It's a bit of a weird situation -- you wind up with devices that can see each others' broadcasts, but that depend upon their gateway(s) to relay unicast traffic. So as long as you have a router address defined on each address block, it works. It *is* kinda funky. You NEVER want to build a network this way from scratch. But sometimes it's the cleanest way to accommodate legacy devices -- we have a couple of them on our network for which this was the simplest of several (worse) alternatives. David Gillett --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Different terms for the same or more secure? Hylton Conacher(ZR1HPC) (Aug 22)
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? maddhatt+securitybasics (Aug 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? eliterhythm (Aug 24)
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? Hylton Conacher(ZR1HPC) (Aug 28)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? Anhtuan Huynh (Aug 25)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? David Gillett (Aug 28)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? Robert D. Holtz - Lists (Aug 28)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? David Gillett (Aug 28)
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? Hylton Conacher(ZR1HPC) (Aug 25)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? David Gillett (Aug 28)
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? Hylton Conacher(ZR1HPC) (Aug 28)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? David Gillett (Aug 29)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? David Gillett (Aug 28)
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? Brian Loe (Aug 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Different terms for the same or more secure? Brian Loe (Aug 31)
- RE: Different terms for the same or more secure? Isaac Van Name (Aug 31)
