Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Least privilege vs Windows server security
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:58:14 -0400
>> For instance, here is an excerpt from a microsoft document I can no
longer
locate:<<
That is the server hardening chapter of the Securing Windows 2000 server
guide:
http://tinyurl.com/ah6ax
You can probably find an online version of the guide on MS Technet.
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman - http://www.davekleiman.com/about.php
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com
[mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On
Behalf Of rmbarnesusa () bigfoot com
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 17:46
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Least privilege vs Windows server security
Have you tried to limit the RPC ports by editing the registry to some
restricted
subset of ports between 49152 through 65535.
For instance, here is an excerpt from a microsoft document I can no
longer
locate:
When limiting RPC traffic in your environment to a certain number of
ports, the
port range chosen should include ports over 50,000. This can be
configured by
setting the following registry settings:
The HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\RPC\Internet key should be
created if it does not already exist.
The HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\RPC\Internet\Ports should be
created and configured as a REG_MULTI_SZ with a value that represents
the
range of ports to be opened. For example, the value 57901-57950 will
open 50
ports for the use of RPC traffic.
The
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\RPC\Internet\PortsInternetAvailable
should be created and configured as REG_SZ with a value of Y. The
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\RPC\Internet\UseInternetPorts
should be created and configured as REG_SZ with a value of Y.
After making the above changes to the Registry, the server should be
restarted.
Note: These changes could affect performance and should be tested
prior to
implementing in production. The exact number of ports that will be
opened will
depend on the environment as well as the use and functionality of the
server.
Client logon times should be monitored. If logon performance is
degraded,
additional ports may need to be opened.
Here is another link in case you have not seen it. It appears fairly
detailed:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/technologies/
activedirectory/deploy/confeat/adrepfir.mspx
This worked for me at least until my regedit mysteriously disappeared
after
applying a Microsoft RPC patch. :-(
Current thread:
- Least privilege vs Windows server security Dan Lynch (Jul 13)
- RE: Least privilege vs Windows server security Ackley, Alex (Jul 13)
- RE: Least privilege vs Windows server security Scott Ramsdell (Jul 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Least privilege vs Windows server security rmbarnesusa (Jul 13)
- RE: Least privilege vs Windows server security dave kleiman (Jul 17)
- Re: Least privilege vs Windows server security Bill Stout (Jul 23)
