Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: VPN problems
From: alexbnedelcu () gmail com
Date: 11 Jun 2007 19:10:09 -0000
As far as i can see there is no NAT problem, you should implement NAT-T if your VPN session is terminated on equipment that lies after a NAT box but in your case you haven't described such a topology. I suppose you're trying to build a l2tp/ipsec remote access connection to your lan from a computer with internet access, i skimmed through the technical specifications for the equipment you are testing and there is no specification for the l2tp protocol. It may be the case that the Ipsec tunnel comes up but the inner l2tp protocol is not supported by the router thus not allowing you to build a solution with the win xp vpn client, you should post some debugging information in order to give us a more accurate picture. As far as i know the windows client only supports by default l2tp/ipsec or PPTP tunnels. I have succesfully managed to implement a l2tp/ipsec remote access solution with a cisco 800 and 1800 series routers and xp vpn clients, but those routers support l2tp. Regarding the choices you have for a vpn client, you could try the cisco vpn client as an alternative to the default one that comes with windows. Alex
Current thread:
- VPN problems Diarmaid McManus (Jun 08)
- Re: VPN problems Kim Guldberg (Jun 09)
- Re: VPN problems Anil Saini (Jun 11)
- Re: VPN problems Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Jun 11)
- Re: VPN problems Kim Guldberg (Jun 12)
- Re: VPN problems Diarmaid McManus (Jun 11)
- Re: VPN problems Anil Saini (Jun 11)
- Re: VPN problems Kim Guldberg (Jun 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: VPN problems alexbnedelcu (Jun 11)
- Re: Re: VPN problems jens . frey (Jun 13)
