Security Basics mailing list archives
Protecting the server farm!
From: WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:01:51 +0400
I have been wondering about the technology means that I can deploy into my infrastructure which is yet at only the designing stage. In a newly designed campus infrastructure, I'll have a datacenter with two core switches to which will my IDFs be connected with a 10 gig uplink.
From my core, I plan to directly connect my 50 odd servers. Various vendors are telling various things.Cisco gives a solution which has a switch containing Firewall and IDS built into it that would sit between my servers and core switches. Foundry gives a solution where they propose a united threat management (UTM) box sitting between my servers and core switch with all internal traffic being diverted through it. Nortel says no need, buy a NAC solution later and your whole network will be well protected.
What do you guys think? Each solution has an added costs and tends to bring about a bottleneck reducing throughput off my server farm to only a gigabit as most of these devices cannot give me more than a Gbit interface.
How do you guys protect your server farm from internal LAN threats? -- No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.21/1010 - Release Date: 9/15/2007 7:54 PM
Current thread:
- Protecting the server farm! WALI (Sep 18)
- R: Protecting the server farm! Vega - Brunello Ivan (Sep 19)
- Re: Protecting the server farm! Brian Laing (Sep 19)
