Security Basics mailing list archives

Protecting the server farm!


From: WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:01:51 +0400

I have been wondering about the technology means that I can deploy into my infrastructure which is yet at only the designing stage. In a newly designed campus infrastructure, I'll have a datacenter with two core switches to which will my IDFs be connected with a 10 gig uplink.

From my core, I plan to directly connect my 50 odd servers.
Various vendors are telling various things.

Cisco gives a solution which has a switch containing Firewall and IDS built into it that would sit between my servers and core switches. Foundry gives a solution where they propose a united threat management (UTM) box sitting between my servers and core switch with all internal traffic being diverted through it. Nortel says no need, buy a NAC solution later and your whole network will be well protected.

What do you guys think? Each solution has an added costs and tends to bring about a bottleneck reducing throughput off my server farm to only a gigabit as most of these devices cannot give me more than a Gbit interface.

How do you guys protect your server farm from internal LAN threats?


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.21/1010 - Release Date: 9/15/2007 7:54 PM



Current thread: