Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Mail relay question
From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <bugtraq () planetcobalt net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:05:46 +0100
On 2008-02-22 Nick Vaernhoej wrote:
I should have been more clear, I consider it spam due to my leaning towards not being open to relay. The vast majority of the spam appears to be returned email because the destination domain doesn't have a recipient for the email.
That's called backscatter, and as long as there are braindead mail server admins who configure their server to accept mail before checking whether it can actually be delivered you will just have to live with it. There are ways to deal with it, though. For example you can put an additional header (X-Canary or something) with some arbitrary string into all your outgoing mail, and discard all backscatter that doesn't contain this string.
I guess knowing the little I do about email mechanisms I don't understand why the IP of the connecting client can craft an email FROM a domain the IP does not resolve to?
Take a look at snail mail. The sender can write arbitrary sender addresses on the letter as well as the envelope. E-mail is just the same. [...]
Depends, my thought was that my wife will trust anything sent to her as long as it appears to come from me.
She's assuming wrong. You'd need digital signatures (like e.g. PGP) to ensure the authenticity of an e-mail (and its sender). Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
Current thread:
- FW: Mail relay question Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 22)
- Re: Mail relay question 0x90 (Feb 22)
- RE: Mail relay question Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 22)
- Re: Mail relay question 0x90 (Feb 25)
- Re: Mail relay question Aaron Howell (Feb 25)
- Re: Mail relay question Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Feb 25)
- RE: Mail relay question Nick Vaernhoej (Feb 22)
- Re: FW: Mail relay question Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Feb 22)
- Re: FW: Mail relay question Aaron Howell (Feb 22)
- RE: Mail relay question Ric Messier (Feb 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW: Mail relay question rafael . almeida (Feb 25)
- Re: Mail relay question 0x90 (Feb 22)
