Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Conflict of interests
From: aaa.bbb () ccc com
Date: 4 May 2009 20:02:28 -0000
Actually, if you have the situation properly documented and LOGGED (audit trail) there shouldn't be an issue with the auditors. Naturally, logging implies that each person has a UNIQUE ID that is logged, no more shared "God Access" IDs. Although it may take a discussion with them to explain to them why it is unavoidable. So why not be proactive, if you suspect that auditors will be concerned, arrange to meet with them before the audit to find out what their concerns would be and how they would like those concerns to be addressed. As a Security person you have to change your perception of auditors. They are not the enemy, they should be your allies. They can provide an independent set of eyes with a different perspective to review your work, identifying potential vulnerability(ies) that you may have missed. Don't forget, many DB applications now have admin level access that allow access to meta data but not directly to specific data stored in the DB. I don't know specifically if the newest versions of Windows Active Directory or Nix provide that type of separation of duties type access. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Learn all of the latest penetration testing techniques in InfoSec Institute's Ethical Hacking class. Totally hands-on course with evening Capture The Flag (CTF) exercises, Certified Ethical Hacker and Certified Penetration Tester exams, taught by an expert with years of real pen testing experience. http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Conflict of interests, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- RE: Conflict of interests James Flaherty (May 05)
- Message not available
- RE: Conflict of interests James Flaherty (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests David Schekaiban (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Richard Thomas (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Richard Thomas (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Aarón Mizrachi (May 06)
- RE: Conflict of interests Dave Kleiman (May 06)
- Re: Conflict of interests s0h0us (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests Adam Pal (May 05)
- Re: Conflict of interests aaa . bbb (May 05)
- Re: Re: Conflict of interests raketomet (May 11)
