Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses?
From: Paul Johnston <paul.johnston () pentest co uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:57:42 +0000
Hi,
which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses: Access Control Lists or Capabilities?
Capabilities. ACLs work nicely for protecting users from each other. I can put an ACL on my department's shared drive and stop outsiders from accessing it. I can put another ACL on the managers' folder and keep non-managers out. But when dealing with trojan horses, we have a different security problem than protecting users from each other. We need to protect a user from a malicious program running under their identity. This is where ACLs break down, as the malicious program gets all the same rights as the user. However, in a capabilities model, each program would only get the absolute minimum capabilities it needs to do its job and not all the rights of a user. A trojan horse is better contained. Paul -- Pentest - When a tick in the box is not enough Paul Johnston - IT Security Consultant / Tiger SST Pentest Limited - ISO 9001 (cert 16055) / ISO 27001 (cert 558982) Office: +44 (0) 161 233 0100 Mobile: +44 (0) 7817 219 072 Email policy: http://www.pentest.co.uk/legal.shtml#emailpolicy Registered Number: 4217114 England & Wales Registered Office: 26a The Downs, Altrincham, Cheshire, WA14 2PU, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? zibingw (Dec 14)
- Re: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? Todd Haverkos (Dec 14)
- Re: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? Adrian J Milanoski (Dec 16)
- RE: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? faruk (Dec 16)
- Re: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? Paul Johnston (Dec 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? glunera (Dec 16)
- Re: which do you think can provide better protection against Trojan horses? Todd Haverkos (Dec 14)
