Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Gateway OS
From: Kenneth Voort <listbounce-01 () voort ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:38:22 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Personally I would steer away from pfSense when multiple WAN connections are involved. It's designed for a single WAN connection on a single IP address serving a moderately sized corporate NAT LAN, and does that quite well (best fit for that use case IMHO), but load balancing and failover and such are definitely _not_ its strong suit. At least that was my experience the last time I worked with it about six months ago. On 10-11-17 8:47 PM, Felipe Martins wrote:
I think Endian is a very good choice but little bit old, like pfsense. I think you are going to like BRFirewall (http://www.brazilfw.com.br/forum/), it's also based on Linux. Felipe On 16/11/2010 22:17, Adrian J Milanoski wrote:There are so many OS's that wouks probably meet your requirements. I have persinnaly setup both pfsense and smoothwall. I would highly rexxommend pfSense handsdown, that OS is very scalable and would do the work of some very high equipment. Install it in a VM first see how it goes. Good luck! Thanks, Adrian _________________ Sent from my iPhone On 2010-11-16, at 12:34 AM, Stephen Cox <stephencoxmail () gmail com> wrote:Thanks. ClearOS is the same as pfsense, but not based on freebsd; its based on RHEL. Regards, Stephen On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Dale Stirling <dale () puredistortion com> wrote:Never heard of that utm but check out pfsense.org this gateway will meet your requirements. Cheers, Dale On 16 Nov 2010 07:56, <stephencoxmail () gmail com> wrote: List, What are your opinions about using ClearOS/Endian UTM instead of a CentOS/RHEL install with addition configuration? (Keep in mind that the Gateway needs to route traffic from 2 asdl routers, filter content and manage bandwidth) Looking out to hear from you, -- Stephen Cox
- --
Kenneth Voort - kenneth {at} voort <SPAMGUARD> {dot} ca
FDF1 6265 EBAB C05C FD06 1AED 158E 14D6 37CD E87F | pgp encrypted email preferred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkzlnM4ACgkQFY4U1jfN6H/sxACdFJfkIiB92M2rdIeZO8yUYIse
9AUAnRgA7m6hEoNzdvmTukYqLRFnQ8hT
=BeTr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how
it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase,
install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are
highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates.
http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Gateway OS Stephen Cox (Nov 15)
- Re: Gateway OS Todd Hughes (Nov 16)
- Re: Gateway OS Dan Pilcheck (Nov 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Gateway OS stephencoxmail (Nov 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Gateway OS Dale Stirling (Nov 16)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Gateway OS Stephen Cox (Nov 16)
- Re: Gateway OS Adrian J Milanoski (Nov 17)
- Re: Gateway OS Felipe Martins (Nov 18)
- Re: Gateway OS Kenneth Voort (Nov 19)
- Re: Gateway OS Stephen Cox (Nov 19)
