Security Basics mailing list archives

FW: Bruce Schneier on Google Apps. Do you trust Google?


From: Dirk Brockhausen <dirk () fantomaster com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:55:12 -0500

First, I don't trust Google.
...
(Yes, sent from a gmail account...)

So at least you know that you're using a Gmail account.

Anyway, if you like to keep your privacy then I would never
use a Gmail account.

But you are not alone, sadly...

Show me 10 Black Hat SEOs who are NOT using a Gmail account...

Dirk (@fantomsurfer from fantomaster.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com
[mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of krymson () gmail com
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:39 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Bruce Schneier on Google Apps. Do you trust Google?

First, I don't trust Google. I haven't trusted Google since shortly
after they went public. At which point they answer to a whole lot of
other people whose only goal is to make money, and not necessarily
espouse the vision of "do no evil." There is money to be made by
gathering information and selling it or at least using it to sell other
services to targeted audiences. Sorry, but I don't trust people enough
to not devolve that in the aim of greed. I like my privacy (even for
silly things like my purchasing or searching habits).

And that says nothing about the integrity of any Google employee.


Second, I'm not sold on the "cloud" idea. I think many orgs are
frustrated with their array of homegrown internal apps and software
cobbling business processes together. The "cloud" seems like a nice
thing (a case of the grass being greener on the other side), but orgs
will get just as frustrated with it given time with it. They can't be
as agile, quick, or customized without paying a high price. They can't
answer questions on how it works or have any reliable assurance of
security, integrity, or availability. Orgs want to treat this like a
utility that is just always on, but it's far too complicated and unique
per org to pigeonhole like that.

The only exceptions I immediately see will be "commoditized" stuff that
is similar across multiple customers. But then you run the risk of the
system being changed and you just have to live with it (like Twitter
changing replies or Facebook changing it's interface). Or being down
and you have to just wait (Salesforce, or again Twitter).

And, of course, everything like that is pretty much already in place
under different names (for instance, we've called this "the web" for a
long time [yes the sarcasm is thick in this paragraph])...which means
"cloud" is just marketing rebranding for those segments. A gross
bastardization (misunderstanding?) of "distributed computing."

I don't always agree with Schneier; I can think for myself, but in this
case I agree with him.

(Yes, sent from a gmail account...)



<- snip ->
"Security is about who you trust," Schneier said. "Do you trust Google
more than your sysadmin? Do you trust Google Docs more than Microsoft
Office?"

"Trust is social," he said. "It's not technical."

Read more:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/07/security-expert-on-
go
ogle-apps-is-google-trustworthy.html

I trust that a Google Employee, whose sole function is to maintain the
system, will ensure that the system is secure, patched and up-to-date.
It is simply about Reputational risk. Reputational risk (damage to an
organization through loss of its reputation or standing), can arise as
a consequence of operational failures. Every company understands
reputational risk, particularly businesses who regard their brand as
one of their most critical assets. Google is one of them. They have a
reputation to maintain.

Note: I posted the following as a comment to the aforementioned
latimes blogpost, so it may be a repeat for some folks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an
SSL certificate.  We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your
company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will
find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital
Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for
set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management
of your encryption keys and digital certificates.

http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be44
2f727d1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate.  We look at how SSL works, how 
it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, 
install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are 
highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates.

http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442f727d1
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: