Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: FIRST and CERT
From: chasin () crimelab crimelab com (Scott Chasin)
Date: Mon, 2 May 94 12:24:47 CDT
Ok, lets end the discussion here:
As I said before, this is getting away from what "bugtraq" is intended
to address. We should not continue the discussion here. Besides, I
don't think there is any disagreements over the basic points:
* Not all response teams are the same
* FIRST is not CERT
* CERT is not "evil incarnate", nor are they useless. They simply
aren't as useful as the image some people have (had)
* The general community is somewhat safer with groups like CERT than without
* Response teams could do a better job in some ill-defined ways.
* Our #1 problem is the people who try to break into our systems,
not the people who are trying to help (misguided or otherwise)
--spaf
(Thanks spaf) Let's continue onward. If you feel some issue discussed here needs further development, please take it offline. --S
Current thread:
- Re: FIRST and CERT Perry E. Metzger (May 02)
- Re: FIRST and CERT Gene Spafford (May 02)
- Re: FIRST and CERT Scott Chasin (May 02)
- Re: FIRST and CERT saouli () math ethz ch (May 02)
- ruserok() & /etc/hosts.equiv Walker Aumann (May 02)
- Re: ruserok() & /etc/hosts.equiv Big Bad Jon (May 02)
- Re: ruserok() & /etc/hosts.equiv Walker Aumann (May 02)
- Debate interuption - New firewalls book RayK (May 03)
- Re: ruserok() & /etc/hosts.equiv Big Bad Jon (May 02)
- Re: FIRST and CERT Eric Brunson (May 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FIRST and CERT John Larson (May 02)
- Re: FIRST and CERT Gene Spafford (May 02)
