Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-14.UNIX.SCO-prwarn.12-Nov-1994
From: spaf () cs purdue edu (Gene Spafford)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 1994 02:20:39 -0500
I think that the biggest pro of full disclosure, is that it get's people off their butts and gets a good solution or patch that much faster.
I have yet to see evidence of this. Based on my conversations with personnel at various computer companies, the only thing full disclosure seems to do is (sometimes) encourage them to release bug fixes without quite as much testing. This sometimes leads to patches that don't completely fix the problem. That is not a "good solution." If anyone can provide me with verifiable evidence that full disclosure results in faster production of patches of good quality, I would be very interested in seeing it. Otherwise, it's just wishful thinking. --spaf
Current thread:
- Re: udp packet storms Mike Raffety (Oct 31)
- Re: udp packet storms Perry E. Metzger (Oct 31)
- Re: udp packet storms Darren Reed (Nov 01)
- Re: udp packet storms Steve Simmons (Nov 01)
- Re: udp packet storms Perry E. Metzger (Nov 01)
- Re: udp packet storms Tim Newsham (Nov 01)
- Re: udp packet storms Pete Shipley (Nov 03)
- bizzare ftp stuff... Tim Scanlon (Nov 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: udp packet storms Perry E. Metzger (Oct 31)
- Re: udp packet storms Charles Howes (Oct 31)
- Re: udp packet storms Mike Raffety (Nov 01)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: udp packet storms Perry E. Metzger (Oct 31)
