Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability
From: nreadwin () london micrognosis com (Neil Readwin)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 19:14:53 +0100
Dan Cross writes:
However, an extremely worthwhile thing to post would be a list of setuid programs which make use of /tmp and are exploitable in the same manner.
setuid is not the issue - any program that creates files in /tmp and reopens them may be vulnerable. That includes basic things like /bin/sh (for << documents), so if root ever runs a shell script then an attack may be possible. If the sticky bit is not set on /tmp then you are toast - end of story. -- nreadwin () micrognosis co uk Phone: +1 908 855 1221 x519 Anything is a cause for sorrow that my mind or body has made
Current thread:
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Michael Dilger (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Neil Readwin (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Dan Cross (Aug 16)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Neil Readwin (Aug 16)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Dan Cross (Aug 17)
- SunOS 4.1.x ptrace flaw Bonfield James (Aug 17)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Dan Cross (Aug 16)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Neil Readwin (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Adam Prato (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Brian Perkins (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Sam Quigley (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Alexander L. Haiut (Aug 16)
- /proc ps for Solaris 2.X Doug Hughes (Aug 16)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Brian Perkins (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Dan Thorson (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Aleph One (Aug 15)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Nathan Lawson (Aug 16)
- Re: BUGTRAQ ALERT: Solaris 2.x vulnerability Aleph One (Aug 15)
