Bugtraq mailing list archives
Anonymous mailings
From: adam () bwh harvard edu (Adam Shostack)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 16:34:39 -0500 (EST)
Robert wrote:
| BTW, if you have to use an anonymous remailer, why don't you use an
| anonymizing mailer that lets someone reply to the given address, so several
| thousand people don't have to read the answer to your question?
Perhaps hes worried about people using the return address to
trace back? Anonymous and pseudononymous mail are very different from
a traffic analysis standpoint.
However, you're right, there are ways to get replies through
remailers that don't involve everyone on the list seeing the mail.
Adam
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
Current thread:
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ), (continued)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Pete Shipley (Jan 26)
- old post on securing a sunos 4.1.* box joshua geller (Jan 30)
- Re: old post on securing a sunos 4.1.* box pluvius (Jan 30)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) smb () research att com (Jan 26)
- Re: Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Pete Hartman (Jan 26)
- Re: Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jonathan M. Bresler (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jonathan M. Bresler (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) smb () research att com (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) anonymous () some lame netcom not site (Jan 30)
- list leadership Robert M. Haas (Jan 31)
- Anonymous mailings Adam Shostack (Jan 31)
- list leadership Robert M. Haas (Jan 31)
